Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 until we get the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for OPENJPA-182, that looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts have been touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 tests clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to other suggestions.
Kevin On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig and others, Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222... A couple of weeks ago, DaveW committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for OPENJPA-182. The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues. This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort. As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress expected function. Thanks, Kevin On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for > fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting > the incubator)? > > Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant > release? > > Craig > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > > > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run > > the tests > > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. > > > > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? > > > > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with > >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to > >>> get that issue resolved if possible. > >> > >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why > > >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? > >> > >> -Patrick > >> > >> -- > >> Patrick Linskey > >> BEA Systems, Inc. > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > > >> __ > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > >> contain > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > >> affiliated > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > >> and/or > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > >> individual > >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > >> recipient, > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> this > >> by email and then delete it. > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM > >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release > >> > > >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Michael- > >> > > > >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to > >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the > > >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed. > >> > > > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the > >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release. > >> > > >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the > >> majority. For > >> > > now, my vote changes to +0. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take > >> > another look > >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. > >> > > >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with > >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to > >> > get that issue resolved if possible. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > -Michael Dick > >> > > >> > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > >> contain > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > >> affiliated > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > >> and/or > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > >> individual or > >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > >> recipient, and > >> have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> this by email > >> and then delete it. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -Michael Dick > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >
