Integration testing

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Kevin,






Craig


On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:

We should try to do a better job of getting test cases checked in for significant patches. Can the tests that you're using to validate the 222 changes be made available to the rest of the community? Perhaps we should expand on the integration test concept used now for examples and tck integration testing. As we develop more and more integration tests, it will become a real drag to incorporate these tests into a successful mvn build. So some strategy will be needed to be able to build quickly but run the integration tests when desired.

Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 until we get the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for OPENJPA-182, that looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts have been touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 tests clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to other

suggestions.

Kevin

On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Craig and others,
Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222...  A couple of weeks ago, DaveW

basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for
OPENJPA-182.  The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues.


but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort.


expected function.

Thanks,
Kevin

On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for
> fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting
> the incubator)?
>
> Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant
> release?
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
>

> > the tests
> > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has.
> >
> > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is?
> >
> > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> >>> get that issue resolved if possible.
> >>

>
> >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later?
> >>
> >> -Patrick
> >>
> >> --
> >> Patrick Linskey
> >> BEA Systems, Inc.

>
> >> __
> >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> contain
> >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> affiliated
> >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> and/or
> >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> individual
> >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient,

> >> this
> >> by email and then delete it.
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM
> >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> >> >
> >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Michael-
> >> > >
> >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >> > >

>
> >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed.
> >> > >

> >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release.
> >> >
> >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the
> >> majority. For
> >> > > now, my vote changes to +0.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take
> >> > another look
> >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow.
> >> >
> >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> >> > get that issue resolved if possible.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -Michael Dick
> >> >
> >>
> >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> contain
> >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> affiliated
> >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> and/or
> >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> individual or
> >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient, and
> >> have received this message in error, please immediately return
> >> this by email
> >> and then delete it.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Michael Dick
>
> Craig Russell

committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress > > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run > >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to > >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ products/jdo

> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature