Hi Bjoern, I would help you with secondary sources . Will help out with the template for stubs too.
No article in Wikipedia is incomplete or complete .:-) Its just stub or otherwise. Would post the documents shortly. -Sibi On Feb 21, 2014 5:22 PM, "Bjoern Hassler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Stuart, > > many thanks. > > What secondary sources would be appropriate? E.g. linking to research articles (published in journals, peer-reviewed)? Or (given that those are written by people involved), do they count as primary sources? THere are some referneces from other organisations to us, so that would work. > > What sort of banner should we put at the top of the article to flag that it's not complete? > > Bjoern > > > On 21 February 2014 12:14, Stuart Lawson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Bjoern, >> >> I think it's a great idea to create Wikipedia articles for these projects. The article for OER4Schools will need quite a lot of work to make it appropriate for Wikipedia; every statement must be referenced, and it can't rely only on primary sources (e.g. the OER4Schools website). >> >> If you know of other sources that discuss the project, please add them or references or list them on the article's talk page for other people to look at. >> >> If you like, you could propose similar articles on the WikiProject Open talk page. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Stuart >> >> >> On 21 February 2014 10:59, Bjoern Hassler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I am currently at the UNESCO Mobile Learning Week, and I thought I'd raise something for discussion. >>> >>> Should there be wikipedia entries on projects that are to do with "open"? I.e. an entry describing the project? >>> >>> Should there be wikipedia entries on educational projects? >>> >>> E.g. the significant UNESCO TISSA project, or the CREATE project http://www.create-rpc.org/ are not on wikipedia. Larger scale projects, such as EfA / GMR: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_For_All >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_for_All_Global_Monitoring_Report >>> are represented. >>> >>> Background: People at the UNESCO Mobile Learning Week here are saying that it's difficult to find out about other projects, and I would advocate that we should use wikipedia to share basic information, rather than setting up a separate platform. >>> >>> For example I've just created this page: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OER4Schools >>> It's fairly unbiased, but at the same time, I am a key person within the project. So while I could defend the neutrality of the article, it may still be frowned upon. >>> >>> What do people think? >>> >>> All the best, >>> Bjoern >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenAccess mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenAccess mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess >> > > > > -- > Dr Bjoern Hassler > Centre for Commonwealth Education (Faculty of Education) > & Digital Services (CARET, University Library) > University of Cambridge > Email: [email protected] > > Open Educational Resources for Teacher Education > http://oer.educ.cam.ac.uk/ > > OER for School-based teacher professional learning in sub-Saharan Africa > http://www.oer4schools.org > > Aptivate | (http://www.aptivate.org) > Email: [email protected] > > Mobile (UK): +44-7952-888939 > Web: http://www.sciencemedianetwork.org > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAccess mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess >
_______________________________________________ OpenAccess mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
