Great - many thanks - so let's discuss this on the talk page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:OER4Schools
Thanks for all your input! Bjoern On 21 February 2014 13:51, Lane Rasberry <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Post notes on Wikipedia in a userpage sandbox so that we can > collaboratively look at this together and get it live so that it will be > easier to reach. > > If you need help doing this, create a Wikipedia account, share the name > here, and then we can meet on-wiki. > > I am user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia. Thanks for doing this. Yes, citing > newspapers is good. > > yours, > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Bjoern Hassler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Stuart, hi all, >> >> the copyright violation isn't really one - I wrote both texts. Now, >> technically you are right of course, but I'll get a CC logo put up on our >> project page, which would resolve the issue. I'll ask the departmental web >> person to do this now! We'll want to rewrite it a bit anyway. >> >> Sibi, Fred: Many thanks for comments and willingness to help out!! Great >> to have your responses! >> Bjoern >> >> >> >> >> On 21 February 2014 13:08, Stuart Lawson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Bjeorn, >>> >>> Research articles are great sources, less so if they are written by >>> those involved, but still valid sources. References from other >>> organisations would be very good. >>> >>> Unfortunately I've realised that a lot of the text of the article is >>> copied from here: >>> https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/cce/initiatives/projects/oer4schools/ >>> which >>> is a copyright violation. As far as I can see, that page is copyrighted (no >>> Creative Commons license), so the copied text needs to be removed and >>> re-written/paraphrased instead. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Stuart >>> >>> >>> On 21 February 2014 11:51, Bjoern Hassler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Stuart, >>>> >>>> many thanks. >>>> >>>> What secondary sources would be appropriate? E.g. linking to research >>>> articles (published in journals, peer-reviewed)? Or (given that those are >>>> written by people involved), do they count as primary sources? THere are >>>> some referneces from other organisations to us, so that would work. >>>> >>>> What sort of banner should we put at the top of the article to flag >>>> that it's not complete? >>>> >>>> Bjoern >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 February 2014 12:14, Stuart Lawson <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Bjoern, >>>>> >>>>> I think it's a great idea to create Wikipedia articles for these >>>>> projects. The article for >>>>> OER4Schools<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OER4Schools> will >>>>> need quite a lot of work to make it appropriate for Wikipedia; every >>>>> statement must be referenced, and it can't rely only on primary sources >>>>> (e.g. the OER4Schools website). >>>>> >>>>> If you know of other sources that discuss the project, please add them >>>>> or references or list them on the article's talk page for other people to >>>>> look at. >>>>> >>>>> If you like, you could propose similar articles on the WikiProject >>>>> Open talk >>>>> page<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Open> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Stuart >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 21 February 2014 10:59, Bjoern Hassler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am currently at the UNESCO Mobile Learning Week, and I thought I'd >>>>>> raise something for discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Should there be wikipedia entries on projects that are to do with >>>>>> "open"? I.e. an entry describing the project?* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Should there be wikipedia entries on educational projects? * >>>>>> >>>>>> E.g. the significant UNESCO TISSA project, or the CREATE project >>>>>> http://www.create-rpc.org/ are not on wikipedia. Larger scale >>>>>> projects, such as EfA / GMR: >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_For_All >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_for_All_Global_Monitoring_Report >>>>>> are represented. >>>>>> >>>>>> Background: People at the UNESCO Mobile Learning Week here are saying >>>>>> that it's difficult to find out about other projects, and I would >>>>>> advocate >>>>>> that we should use wikipedia to share basic information, rather than >>>>>> setting up a separate platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> For example I've just created this page: >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OER4Schools >>>>>> It's fairly unbiased, but at the same time, I am a key person within >>>>>> the project. So while I could defend the neutrality of the article, it >>>>>> may >>>>>> still be frowned upon. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do people think? >>>>>> >>>>>> All the best, >>>>>> Bjoern >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> OpenAccess mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OpenAccess mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ OpenAccess mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
