Give me a price quote and timeline on rxgk and ipv6, and let's see if we can get a public foundation or crowdfunding project, or something to come up with the money.
If I have a quote and implementation plan, I can figure out what I can do 'in-kind' myself and then figure out if others can do the rest in-kind, or if we need to go doorknocking to get the damned funding. At least give me a workplan on what's left to finish for rxgk. I spent yesterday hurting my brain merging rxk5 up to the latest release. > Looking through the commit history of the OpenAFS repository. There are > a total of four minor patches that have been contributed by "Troy > Benjegerdes" between June 2005 and June 2006. Yet here you are in > September 2012 demanding that I and the rest of the community put your > needs ahead of our own priorities? How is that supposed to work? > > Are you willing to commit to do the full work necessary to implement > IPv6 in the AFS3 protocol and OpenAFS implementation in a manner that is > backward compatible, does not require flag days, permits rollback to > prior OpenAFS versions when necessary, and passes all standardization > requirements? If so, the gatekeepers are willing to provide advice, > review designs, and review code contributions just as we do for everyone > else. > > Jeffrey Altman > > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
