On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 23:17:08 -0500 Troy Benjegerdes <[email protected]> wrote:
> If the gatekeepers wish to remain relevant, than I would please > request they come up with a workable IPv6 wire protocol that can be > incrementally developed and deployed to get working isolated cells > running v6 within 6 months. I haven't been following your recent discussions wrt ipv6 very closely, but I would like to just point out that the _first step_ of ipv6 integration is just internal support in the rx library/libraries, as has been mentioned in previous 'plans'/'roadmaps' for ipv6 support. Doing that step has, as far as I know, relatively zero opposition, and zero roadblocks; no standards or wire protocol changes or anything. And still, it has not been done. I don't see anything stopping you, or anyone, from doing that. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
