<<On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:08:13 -0500, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> said:
> But anyway, what I was trying to talk about is a case where a particular > protocol is never standardized (at least, not intended to be, at least, > not in the short term). You can request a bunch of code points for > 'private/experimental' use, and then never tell anyone what they do. > So, Jeff is just saying, yes, that is following the "process". As in, > that is playing by the rules. You're write, I misparsed what Jeffrey wrote. (I was reading "following" as 'sequential', not 'adhering to'.) Never mind. -GAWollman _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
