On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:56:15 -0600 > Ken Dreyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Additionally I have a question about infrastructure. OpenAFS hosts a >> *lot* of infrastructure compared to many open-source projects. Given >> the discussions about available resources, should the new ticketing >> system be hosted by OpenAFS, or would GitHub's issue tracker or Google >> Code's issue tracker be viable? > > Not having bidirectional e-mail interaction is going to sound like a > blocker for many people. Or at least, it's going to make it really > really annoying to use, to the degree that it may get used even less > than the current system by developers. (Some of those may have proper > email support... I just mention that because that's usually what's > missing from such services, iirc.)
This is good to know. I didn't know this feature was so important to the developers. FWIW I tested this today on a Google Code project, and a new email didn't generate a ticket. So that one's out for now. - Ken _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
