> David Boyes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. afscreds simply doesn't work reliably. as a result, its > continued > >> use is in my opinion not an option on Vista, 2008 and Windows 7. > > Valid point, but it seems a bit precipitous to remove it before a > > replacement with equivalent function is available. Clearly it works > > for *some* people. > > It also clearly doesn't work for some people. Perhaps just making the > installation of afscreds optional would be acceptable?
OK as a short term fix, but I'd like to solve the problem, not the symptom. I'd like to know what remains to be done, and how long that would take. Then I can go find some funding for it, if it's not excessive. -- db
