On 17 Jun 2010, at 21:29, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steven Jenkins <steven.jenk...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I thought that enabling DAFS to be on by default was the major feature >> of 1.6. > > Shipping DAFS and declaring it supported is the major feature of 1.6. > Making it the default is another question entirely.
The difficulty here is - what should packagers build? If DAFS isn't on by default, then most folk won't actually get the benefit of running it unless they build their own AFS servers. I suspect that shipping 1.6 with dafs disabled by default isn't actually going to result in much perceived change over 1.4. I wonder how hard it would be to ship both versions of the fileserver side by side ... Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
