no objection here, esp. if there's anyone out there with the spare time for and interest in testing them.
> -----Original Message----- > From: ja...@rampaginggeek.com > Sent: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:21:08 -0400 > To: sha...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] buildbot and packages > > Are there any objections to doing this for non-windows platforms? It > could be a nightly build. > > On 09/13/2012 12:35 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote: >> we talked about doing it for releases; this would be a generalized case >> of it >> >> possibly, but i can see it becoming a support nightmare. you're running >> what?? >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> >> wrote: >>> Would it be feasible or desirable to have Buildbot actually provide >>> install-able packages (eg. RPMs on Linux, MSIs on Windows)? It could >>> help new users confirm "yes, this change fixes my bug". >>> > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info ____________________________________________________________ FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
