if we do that, nightly (not per patch) builds would be better Derrick
On Sep 14, 2012, at 0:59, Chaz Chandler <cl...@inbox.com> wrote: > no objection here, esp. if there's anyone out there with the spare time for > and interest in testing them. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ja...@rampaginggeek.com >> Sent: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:21:08 -0400 >> To: sha...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] buildbot and packages >> >> Are there any objections to doing this for non-windows platforms? It >> could be a nightly build. >> >> On 09/13/2012 12:35 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote: >>> we talked about doing it for releases; this would be a generalized case >>> of it >>> >>> possibly, but i can see it becoming a support nightmare. you're running >>> what?? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Would it be feasible or desirable to have Buildbot actually provide >>>> install-able packages (eg. RPMs on Linux, MSIs on Windows)? It could >>>> help new users confirm "yes, this change fixes my bug". >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenAFS-info mailing list >> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org >> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > > ____________________________________________________________ > FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! > Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth > > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
