Troy Benjegerdes <ho...@hozed.org> writes: > So are we ever going to have a situation where we have 255 nightly > builds, and we do *not* release a minor update? (say 1.6.2 to 1.6.3?)
Less than three months to go before that would be true of 1.6.2. > I would argue for a version scheme something like: > major.minor.subminor.daily-build-id > where if we ever hit more than 128 daily builds, Already has happened since 1.6.1, which was released on March 26th. windlord:~> date -d "128 days ago" Sun May 13 00:24:35 PDT 2012 > Don't we have bigger problems if we run out of dev versions than > figuring out what an end-user is running? A dearth of release managers, for example. Among the other things that dearth is a bigger problem than is the absence of nightly builds. :) -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info