On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM, David Lonie <david.lo...@kitware.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:34 PM, My Th <rei4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > By the way, is a general migration to git still off the table? >> > >> > I'm OK with this, but I think we'd need a more comprehensive vote. >> >> That is two, how about others? :) > > > Make that three ;-) > > A better question may be, who wants to keep svn, and why?
I don't much care, but I'm a very occasional user at this point. I defer to those who are most active. There's one thing I really like about git: they use digital signatures on changes. From what I've heard, even a major security breach won't let a hacker secretely inject code changes. There is no one "master" repository. The distributed nature of the "repository" combined with digital signatures means that hack attempts can be instantly detected. If someone hacked into the source server undetected and changed the SVN database, we'd never know it. Craig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
