On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Alex Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > Can someone explain what the benefit is of writing cfcomponents as > pure script is ? What does it allow you to do that you can't with > cfcomponent tag , cffunction tag and using cfscript within your > function bodies ?
I find the script syntax far easier to read and work with and since I'm maintaining FW/1, I decide how it's coded :) Folks can still use FW/1 1.2 on OpenBD. I do hope OpenBD becomes compatible with ACF and Railo in this area tho' since I'm seeing a lot of all-script CFCs in newer projects out there... -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
