As you say it personal preference, I think its a shame in a way though because often developers have little say over the versions of the engines they run and the issue with using the bleeding edge in something like a framework is more people will be culled from usage. Good to know version 1 will work on openbd though.
A On Thursday, 14 July 2011, Sean Corfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Alex Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can someone explain what the benefit is of writing cfcomponents as >> pure script is ? What does it allow you to do that you can't with >> cfcomponent tag , cffunction tag and using cfscript within your >> function bodies ? > > I find the script syntax far easier to read and work with and since > I'm maintaining FW/1, I decide how it's coded :) > > Folks can still use FW/1 1.2 on OpenBD. I do hope OpenBD becomes > compatible with ACF and Railo in this area tho' since I'm seeing a lot > of all-script CFCs in newer projects out there... > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > > -- > official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- Alex Skinner Managing Director Pixl8 Interactive Tel: +448452600726 Email: [email protected] Web: pixl8.co.uk -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
