On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Alex Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > As you say it personal preference, I think its a shame in a way though > because often developers have little say over the versions of the > engines they run and the issue with using the bleeding edge in > something like a framework is more people will be culled from usage.
If you work in an environment that is averse to the bleeding edge, you should be used a stable release version of frameworks. That's what FW/1 1.2 is. FW/1 2.0 is bleeding edge and shouldn't even be considered for production work unless you're the adventurous sort (I happen to have an early build of 2.0 in production at World Singles - but then I have a history of going to production with pre-release software). -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
