> data structure defined by a particular organisation but has no true
> semantics in health, where as a discharge or referral is a common concept.

Well, not strictly true - the CCR has semantics that aren't the same as
discharge or referral but they are seemingly clear to the CCR people
 - the CCR is a summary
record that could be used by an (unknown at the time of composition)
future health provider to continue the care of this patient. If it becomes
popular it may become a common health concept.

> developed by an organisation we would have millions of archetypes and no
> semantic interoperability.

Well, we'd maybe have multiple archetype sets (as opposed to one set of
archetypes) each defined by different organisations. ASTM, NHS, NEHTA
etc. I don't think we'd even break into the 1000's if every health standards
body defined their own?

I thought semantic interoperability was the ability to computationally
recognise the
similarities in archetyped data between systems using terminologies etc,
therefore allowing data to be used across multiple systems. i.e. this
is a soap 'plan' because it is in a section marked with the term
binding for 'plan', and over here in this other completely different
archetype we might have a similar section and therefore we know they
have the same meaning. If semantic interoperability is just that everyone
agrees to use the same definitions for everything, then we don't really
need a fancy word like semantic interoperability for it. Its like saying
we'd have semantic interoperability if everyone agreed to use the Medical
Director database schema - which is true but pointless - if everyone
agreed in the first place we wouldn't be worried about the semantics
when we go to interoperate.

I'm not suggesting that every player in the whole health system
would be going around defining archetypes for everything. But surely
we're not suggesting that there would only be ONE set of archetypes
for the whole world (with templates making the constraints for local
variations)?

Andrew
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical



Reply via email to