I wonder if the avaible technology says it is time to shift the paradigm and to post articles to wikis FOR PEER REVIEW... FWIW: Quasi-tangentially, I just saw a PR on the theme that OpenClinica is launching a wiki at http://www.openclinica.org/dokuwiki/
Thanks for everyone's patience on this thread. Ed <snip>OJS is for example used by the open-access electronic Journal of Health Informatics (eJHI, http://www.ejhi.net) with quite good experiences. However, one problem you don't tackle with this is the problem that a thorough peer-review process takes quite a bit of time, even if subsequent publishing after acceptance can be faster than with conventional journals. My personal view is that both ad-hoc (email discussion lists, wikis etc) and peer-reviewed content in journals (preferably, but not necessarily open-access) are needed. Sebastian</snip> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070123/5ff646cb/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
