--- Tim Churches <tchur at optushome.com.au> wrote: > Ed Dodds wrote: > > I wonder if the avaible technology says it is time > to shift the paradigm > > and to post articles to wikis FOR PEER REVIEW... > > An new open access journal, PLoS ONE (see > http://www.plosone.org ) > offers a rapid, traditional (albeit fully online, no > paper) peer-review > process together with the ability for readers to > annotate and comment on > papers after they are published.
The British Medical Journal, which was the first paper medical journal made freely available online, has allowed this for several years with success. Putting up ones paper for comment before publication may worry many authors as it can be "stolen". When the number of publications are given so much importance in ones CV, this problem remains real. nandalal ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
