Hi Ian, Erik's ideas are a great start!
-- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos > From: Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com > Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:24:49 +0100 > Subject: Re: openEHR Transition Announcement (about regional/national openehr > organizations) > To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org > CC: openehr-technical at openehr.org > > Thanks Erik, > > These feel like very sound proposals, in particular the focus on > bottom-up local development. > > Pablo, Shinji - would Erik's suggestions be the kind of support that > you would hope to have? > > Ian > > Dr Ian McNicoll > office +44 (0)1536 414 994 > fax +44 (0)1536 516317 > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > skype ianmcnicoll > ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com > > Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK > openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge > Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > BCS Primary Health Care www.phcsg.org > > > > > On 7 September 2011 08:31, Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 08:38, Ian McNicoll > > <Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > >> So, my question back, is > >> "What sort of support would you like to see, given that significant > >> central resourcing is not likely in the short term?" > > [...] > >> Would it be sufficient for the Foundation to give 'official status' to > >> regional affiliates e.g. openEHR Japan, or are there other practical > >> suggestions as to how best to support regional affiliates? > > > > I would guess that an 'official status' recognition and thus links in > > online (and some offline) information resources would be a major > > thing, more imoportant than funding, especially if this also allowed > > the regional organisation to arrange "official" openEHR > > gatherings/conferences etc. It would be reasonable if the local > > organisation could keep money left over from such (possibly partly > > commercially sponsored) gatherings/conferences. > > > > Of course it would be reasonable if the foundation had some > > requirements on official local organisations, like having: > > - open membership > > - statutes matching regional democratic traditions and the openEHR > > goals (internal governance rules or whatever the swedish word > > "stadgar" should be translated to) > > - proper accounting and audit > > - a duty to have a dialogue with the central openEHR foundation > > regarding plans involving using the openEHR tradmark for events etc > > - ...probably more... > > > > For local organisations I think bottom up comunity driven governance > > with elected boards etc is the only way to go, not top-down. > > > > Best regards, > > Erik Sundvall > > erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ Tel: +46-13-286733 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-clinical mailing list > > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110907/1b808b79/attachment.html>
