Hi, Sent from my iPad
On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Stefan Sauermann <sauermann at technikum-wien.at> wrote: > Hello eveybody! > Looking at this discussion, the volume it is taking weighted against the > visible progress I ask myself if this is an efficient way to reach harmonised > conclusions. > > In our experience doing the national EHR standards and the lab report for > Austria we noticed: > - Once you reach a sufficient level of detail it is not possible to reach > generic (one fits all) solutions within available timeframes. > - Data models and their descriptions only started to work after all involved > had agreed on a specific, crisp and clear definition of the usecase. > - No information model / description did work for all thinkable usecases. > - We had to tailor information models to specific usecases. > - Then bridging from one use case into the other becomes a challenge, as > subtle differences in the information will become an issue. > - In order to bridge information from one specific use case into the other we > typically need to define another specific usecase. > > I do not see the specific usecases you are referring to. I therefore can not > contribute to or understand this discussion. Maybe I missed something. Sorry! > > Greetings from Vienna, > Stefan Sauermann > > Program Director > Biomedical Engineering Sciences (Master) > > University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien > Hoechstaedtplatz 5, 1200 Vienna, Austria > P: +43 1 333 40 77 - 988 > M: +43 664 6192555 > E: stefan.sauermann at technikum-wien.at > > I: www.technikum-wien.at/mbe > I: www.technikum-wien.at/ibmt > I: www.healthy-interoperability.at > > Am 22.06.2012 09:29, schrieb Gerard Freriks: >> >> Yes. >> >> It all is about classifying. >> It is all about proper definitions we all share and use. >> >> I believe that when we all interpret the definitions in our own way in our >> own data bases all is working nicely. >> >> The moment we start to exchange this data we will discover that we are not >> interoperable, >> The moment we start to re-use data in clinical decision support service we >> will discover that all systems that worked so nicely, have become problems >> to connect. >> >> As EN13606 we work at full semantic interoperability as much as possible. >> So we have to define many things, we use to produce archetypes, properly. >> Don't we all have an obligation to make semantic interoperability possible? >> >> >> Gerard Freriks >> +31 620347088 >> gfrer at luna.nl >> >> >> >> >> On 22 Jun 2012, at 02:45, Jussara wrote: >> >>> Think the background of our discussions is about CLASSfying. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120622/064cdd10/attachment.html>
