Hi William,
This (http://www.northeastcenter.com/modified-glasgow-coma-scale-for-infants-and-children.htm) is a pediatric GCS which is adapted from Davis RJ et al: Head and spinal cord injury. In Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care, edited by MC Rogers. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1987; James H, Anas N, Perkin RM: Brain Insults in Infants and Children. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1985; and Morray JP et al: Coma scale for use in brain-injured children. Critical Care Medicine 12:1018, 1984. At least this is a starting point. Cheers, Stef Op 18 mrt. 2014, om 06:18 heeft William R4C <wgoossen at results4care.nl> het volgende geschreven: >> >> Van: "William Goossen" <wgoossen at results4care.nl> >> Datum: 17 maart 2014 21:28:31 CET >> Aan: <patientcare at lists.hl7.org>, <cimi-modelling-taskforce at >> googlegroups.com>, <owner-ciclist at lists.hl7.org>, "'Martin Hurrell'" >> <martinhurrell at gmail.com>, <openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org> >> Onderwerp: Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale information request >> Antwoord aan: "William Goossen" <wgoossen at results4care.nl> >> >> Dear all, >> >> I am currently working on the DCM for the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). This was >> balloted in 2010 and reconciled. I am trying to work on the reconciliation >> despite that HL7 Int is not further interesting in publishing this kind of >> work. >> >> One of the issues is that there is a pediatric GCS apparently. However, that >> was not included in the DCM GCS. >> >> Given the completely different target group, and hence differences in >> interpretations and probably scores, I think this must be a different >> instrument, with different codes per data element to differentiate between >> adult and child versions. >> >> 1. Does anyone of you have proper references / articles in which the >> development, validation and reliability of this scale is described? >> >> 2. Does anyone have detailed information on its representation in >> any format? Hl7 template, archetype, UML, OWL, other? >> >> 3. Does anyone have (information about) detailed codes for the data >> elements (total score, eye, moving, verbal) and for the value set per data >> element? >> >> 4. What is in general your opinion on the same instrument >> revalidated for other target groups? Should these be equivalent or different >> identified, modelled and coded from the original instrument? >> >> Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards, >> dr. William T.F. Goossen >> directeur Results 4 Care B.V. >> De Stinse 15 >> 3823 VM Amersfoort >> the Netherlands >> telefoon +31654614458 >> e-mail: wgoossen at results4care.nl >> DCMHelpdesk at results4care.eu >> skype: williamgoossenmobiel >> kamer van koophandel 32133713 >> http://www.results4care.nl >> http://www.results4care.eu >> http://results4care.wikispaces.com/ >> http://www.linkedin.com/company/711047 >> http://results4care.wikispaces.com/3.+Cursussen+Nederlands >> >> >> <image001.png> >> >> *********************************************************************************** >> Manage your subscriptions | View the archives | Unsubscribe | Terms of use >> > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140318/e2e3db4c/attachment.html>
