> What is in general your opinion on the same instrument revalidated for other > target groups? Should these be equivalent or different identified, modelled > and coded from the original instrument?
In Jan Talmons example there are four axis: - set of questions - set of possible answers for each question - algorithm to calculate the result - the result interpretation It is the same scale when all these four axis are identical. When they are not, each variation has to be a separate scale. In the example I see 5 different scales. All have the same ?pattern? of 3 sections, with respectively 4, 6, 5 different questions, plus one common algorithm. I assume the same interpretation of the result for all 5 scales. GF Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gfrer at luna.nl On 18 mrt. 2014, at 08:09, Talmon (CRISP) <talmon at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote: > William > > Het is zelfs nog meer gecompliceerd omdat e.e.a nog van leeftijd afhankelijk > is. Een simpel google leverde http://ilemsc.org/PTHI/PGCS_Form.pdf > > On 18 mrt. 2014, at 06:18, William R4C <wgoossen at results4care.nl> wrote: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140318/dfea565b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140318/dfea565b/attachment.asc>
