William

Het is zelfs nog meer gecompliceerd omdat e.e.a nog van leeftijd afhankelijk 
is. Een simpel google leverde http://ilemsc.org/PTHI/PGCS_Form.pdf

On 18 mrt. 2014, at 06:18, William R4C <wgoossen at 
results4care.nl<mailto:wgoossen at results4care.nl>> wrote:


Van: "William Goossen" <wgoossen at results4care.nl<mailto:wgoossen at 
results4care.nl>>
Datum: 17 maart 2014 21:28:31 CET
Aan: <patientcare at lists.hl7.org<mailto:patientcare at lists.hl7.org>>, 
<cimi-modelling-taskforce at googlegroups.com<mailto:cimi-modelling-taskforce 
at googlegroups.com>>, <owner-ciclist at lists.hl7.org<mailto:owner-ciclist at 
lists.hl7.org>>, "'Martin Hurrell'" <martinhurrell at 
gmail.com<mailto:martinhurrell at gmail.com>>, <openehr-clinical-bounces at 
lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org>>
Onderwerp: Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale information request
Antwoord aan: "William Goossen" <wgoossen at results4care.nl<mailto:wgoossen at 
results4care.nl>>

Dear all,

I am currently working on the DCM for the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). This was 
balloted in 2010 and reconciled. I am trying to work on the reconciliation 
despite that HL7 Int is not further interesting in publishing this kind of work.

One of the issues is that there is a pediatric GCS apparently. However, that 
was not included in the DCM GCS.

Given the completely different target group, and hence differences in 
interpretations and probably scores, I think this must be a different 
instrument, with different codes per data element to differentiate between 
adult and child versions.

1.         Does anyone of you have proper references / articles in which the 
development, validation and reliability of this scale is described?

2.         Does anyone have detailed information on its representation in any 
format? Hl7 template, archetype, UML, OWL, other?

3.         Does anyone have (information about) detailed codes for the data 
elements (total score, eye, moving, verbal) and for the value set per data 
element?

4.         What is in general your opinion on the same instrument revalidated 
for other target groups? Should these be equivalent or different identified, 
modelled and coded from the original instrument?

Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
dr. William T.F. Goossen
directeur Results 4 Care B.V.
De Stinse 15
3823 VM Amersfoort
the Netherlands
telefoon +31654614458
e-mail: wgoossen at results4care.nl<mailto:wgoossen at results4care.nl>
DCMHelpdesk at results4care.eu<mailto:DCMHelpdesk at results4care.eu>
skype: williamgoossenmobiel
kamer van koophandel 32133713
http://www.results4care.nl<http://www.results4care.nl/>
http://www.results4care.eu<http://www.results4care.nl/>
http://results4care.wikispaces.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/company/711047
http://results4care.wikispaces.com/3.+Cursussen+Nederlands


<image001.png>


***********************************************************************************
Manage your subscriptions<http://www.hl7.org/listservice> | View the 
archives<http://lists.hl7.org/read/?forum=patientcare> | 
Unsubscribe<http://www.hl7.org/tools/unsubscribe.cfm?email=wgoossen at 
results4care.nl&list=patientcare> | Terms of 
use<http://www.hl7.org/myhl7/managelistservs.cfm?ref=nav#listrules>

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at 
lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140318/b2585490/attachment-0001.html>

Reply via email to