I would correct them and say that openehr has been on their hype cycle before. Do we know what Oracle is doing?
Would be good to correct their statement. Point out that their US view means they are not globally relevant! Cheers Sam Sent from my phone -----Original Message----- From: "Thomas Beale" <[email protected]> Sent: ?29/?10/?2014 4:17 AM To: "openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org" <openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: Relationship openEHR/CIMI On 28/10/2014 18:41, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: Thanks Thomas and Seref! I think the main point for this report is your statement on what openEHR is in relation to CIMI. I don?t know why they?ve brought CIMI into this at all really, since neither DIPS nor the National ICT governance is relating our work to CIMI at all. Where would they have got this kind of misconception from? well, as you know Gartner does love their hype-cycle. I guess they tend to view things from that perspective. How they think CIMI is strongly connected with openEHR, or even anything like the same kind of thing is a mystery. I imagine that some of us here, or the board could produce a statement on openEHR / CIMI, but really I think it would make more sense if the relevant Norway authority (MoH or whomever) was to make that request. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141029/fcb45de5/attachment-0001.html>
