ouch! :) Am 29.10.2014 09:31, schrieb Bakke, Silje Ljosland: > > Here's another statement from one of the mentioned reports (translated > from Norwegian language). This also seems like a bit of a > misunderstanding to me. Would anyone like to comment? > > "National ICT has chosen archetypes as a method for structuring EHR > data. It is unclear whether other options have been considered, for > example SNOMED-CT in combination with ICD-10 as used in many of the > leading systems internationally." > > Regards, > *Silje * > > *From:*openEHR-clinical > [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of > *Bakke, Silje Ljosland > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:31 AM > *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions > *Subject:* RE: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > I didn't know openEHR had previously been on their hype cycle. When > was this, and what happened? And where does Oracle come into this? > > Regards, > *Silje * > > *From:*openEHR-clinical > [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Dr > Sam Heard > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:31 AM > *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions > *Subject:* RE: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > I would correct them and say that openehr has been on their hype cycle > before. Do we know what Oracle is doing? > > Would be good to correct their statement. Point out that their US view > means they are not globally relevant! > > Cheers Sam > > Sent from my phone > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From: *Thomas Beale <mailto:thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> > *Sent: *?29/?10/?2014 4:17 AM > *To: *openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org > <mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org> > *Subject: *Re: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > On 28/10/2014 18:41, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: > > Thanks Thomas and Seref! > > I think the main point for this report is your statement on what > openEHR is in relation to CIMI. I don't know why they've brought > CIMI into this at all really, since neither DIPS nor the National > ICT governance is relating our work to CIMI at all. Where would > they have got this kind of misconception from? > > > well, as you know Gartner does love their hype-cycle. I guess they > tend to view things from that perspective. How they think CIMI is > strongly connected with openEHR, or even anything like the same kind > of thing is a mystery. > > I imagine that some of us here, or the board could produce a statement > on openEHR / CIMI, but really I think it would make more sense if the > relevant Norway authority (MoH or whomever) was to make that request. > > - thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
-- *Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.* Peter L. Reichertz Institut f?r Medizinische Informatik Technische Universit?t Braunschweig und Medizinische Hochschule Hannover M?hlenpfordtstra?e 23 D-38106 Braunschweig T +49 (0)531 391-2129 F +49 (0)531 391-9502 birger.haarbrandt at plri.de http://www.plri.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141029/4c0dd8c8/attachment.html>
