Rofl here. That's really funny, reminded me of this: http://healthitnerd.blogspot.com.au/2008/12/europes-turn-to-waste-money.html
Grahame > On 29 Oct 2014, at 7:31 pm, "Bakke, Silje Ljosland" <silje.ljosland.bakke at > helse-bergen.no> wrote: > > Here?s another statement from one of the mentioned reports (translated from > Norwegian language). This also seems like a bit of a misunderstanding to me. > Would anyone like to comment? > > ?National ICT has chosen archetypes as a method for structuring EHR data. It > is unclear whether other options have been considered, for example SNOMED-CT > in combination with ICD-10 as used in many of the leading systems > internationally.? > > Regards, > Silje > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Bakke, Silje Ljosland > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:31 AM > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Subject: RE: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > I didn?t know openEHR had previously been on their hype cycle. When was this, > and what happened? And where does Oracle come into this? > > Regards, > Silje > > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Dr Sam Heard > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:31 AM > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Subject: RE: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > I would correct them and say that openehr has been on their hype cycle > before. Do we know what Oracle is doing? > > Would be good to correct their statement. Point out that their US view means > they are not globally relevant! > > Cheers Sam > > Sent from my phone > From: Thomas Beale > Sent: ?29/?10/?2014 4:17 AM > To: openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org > Subject: Re: Relationship openEHR/CIMI > > On 28/10/2014 18:41, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: > Thanks Thomas and Seref! > > I think the main point for this report is your statement on what openEHR is > in relation to CIMI. I don?t know why they?ve brought CIMI into this at all > really, since neither DIPS nor the National ICT governance is relating our > work to CIMI at all. Where would they have got this kind of misconception > from? > > > well, as you know Gartner does love their hype-cycle. I guess they tend to > view things from that perspective. How they think CIMI is strongly connected > with openEHR, or even anything like the same kind of thing is a mystery. > > I imagine that some of us here, or the board could produce a statement on > openEHR / CIMI, but really I think it would make more sense if the relevant > Norway authority (MoH or whomever) was to make that request. > > - thomas > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141029/a14297a9/attachment.html>
