And FOLDERs are nestable and archetypable, so you can do just what you say Jim, and I can do something completely different in my EHR (although, if we both have the same archetype source, we might end up being the same....)
- thomas beale Jim Warren wrote: >Dear Sam, > >I think it's wonderful to take OpenEHR in that direction -- not sure what I >think of "My Folder" as a name per se :-\ > >It potentially creates a bit of complication for the app in that it'd need to >interface with the doctor/practice appointment book, but as a record concept it >seems great. Consent... well, as long as online consent has status. > >There are of course lots of other folder possibilities: > >1. My Goals. Patient goals in their own terms with ongoing patient (and >provider) assessment of attainment. Probably fit in exercise regimens here. > >2. My Medications. A place for the patient to enter OTC and alternative >medications. GEHR handles the fact that this info derives from the patient. >The GP app could provide the ability to review-and-confirm the patient's >entries. > >3. My Learning. A set of on-line learning links apropos to this patient, >preferrably including online quizzes and log of results. > >[Perhaps all of the above, including the appointments, goes under My Plan.] > >4. My Observations. Home blood glucose, BP, etc. log -- OK, I'm getting >carried away. > >I like the overall direction a lot. > >Jim > >A/Prof Jim Warren >Director, Advanced Computing Research Centre >University of South Australia >Mawson Lakes SA 5095 AUSTRALIA >+61 8 8302 3446 >warren at cs.unisa.edu.au > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sam Heard [mailto:sam.heard at bigpond.com] >Sent: Monday, 25 November 2002 18:09 >To: Openehr-Technical >Subject: Patient notifications > > >Dear All > >I have been developing the idea of part of the record that the patient can >write in - I have (Gates style) called it My Folder (eh?) and have two >subfolders in it at present - consent statements (as these will be written >by the patient) and appointments and notifications. > >It is clear that the patient needs to write and interact with these. I have >thought recently that we may be best to develop a transaction for each of >the patient notifications - which will have all the details in it - rather >than process notifications into a collected transaction (like a calendar) - >this means that the application will need to process these. > >I have thought that we could have an archive folder for when the patient has >done whatever was required - or declined to do so. This would mean perhaps >an archive folder and an entry for the outcome of the notification. > >What do you think? > >Sam >____________________________________________ >Dr Sam Heard >The Good Electronic Health Record >Ocean Informatics, openEHR >105 Rapid Creek Rd >Rapid Creek NT 0810 >Ph: +61 417 838 808 >sam.heard at bigpond.com >www.gehr.org >www.openEHR.org >__________________________________________ > >- >If you have any questions about using this list, >please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > >- >If you have any questions about using this list, >please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > > -- .............................................................. Deep Thought Informatics Pty Ltd mailto:thomas at deepthought.com.au openEHR - http://www.openEHR.org Archetypes - http://www.deepthought.com.au/it/archetypes.html Community Informatics - http://www.deepthought.com.au/ci/rii/Output/mainTOC.html .............................................................. - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
