Matisse are using standard SQL with their OODBMS and it seems to be working
fine.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karsten Hilbert" <karsten.hilb...@gmx.net>
To: <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: OODBMS


> Thomas,
>
> seems like you don't get my point.
>
> I am not in the least concerned about what to do when my
> frontend or backend decide to go fishing on behalf of the nice
> day instead of humming along in the office.
>
> You stated that you prefer object-oriented databases. I
> expressed the opinion that in the case of, say, bankruptcy of
> my closed source vendor I am stuck with this huge chunk of
> binary data called OODBMS. I wondered if there's a tool
> available for OODBMS' (like FastObject) that works like psql
> for PostgreSQL and lets me browse the objects and their
> relations *without* the vendors application regardless of
> whether the objects were stored there by Java, C++, Huskell,
> Objective-C or fad-of-the-day.
>
> I want to make sure to be able to recover my data without the
> vendor's software offering that and at a point where I cannot
> pay the vendor large bribes to include such functionality
> since the vendor is gone.
>
> This isn't, however, related to OpenEHR anymore, so maybe
> should be taken off the list.
>
> Karsten
> -- 
> GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
> E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
> -
> If you have any questions about using this list,
> please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
>
>

-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

Reply via email to