This 1..1 default for existence is an unfortunate error in the ADL 1.4 specification, and is gone in the ADL 1.5 specification. For the most reliable place to validate archetypes, see the new ADL 1.5 Workbench, coming out in a few days.
- thomas beale On 16/07/2010 13:09, Leonardo Moretti wrote: > Thanks Alessandro, > yes you are right, generally protocol is optional in RM, but I'm wondering > if it becomes mandatory when defined in the archetype. > ADL doesn't explicit the occurrences of protocol (I imagine the default is > 0..1), but in XML representation of the archetype I find > ... > <attributes xsi:type="C_SINGLE_ATTRIBUTE"> > <existence> > <lower_unbounded>false</lower_unbounded> > <upper_unbounded>false</upper_unbounded> > <lower>1</lower> > <upper>1</upper> > </existence> > <rm_attribute_name>protocol</rm_attribute_name> > <children xsi:type="C_COMPLEX_OBJECT"> > <rm_type_name>ITEM_TREE</rm_type_name> > <occurrences> > <upper_included>true</upper_included> > <lower_included>true</lower_included> > <upper_unbounded>false</upper_unbounded> > <lower_unbounded>false</lower_unbounded> > <upper>1</upper> > <lower>1</lower> > </occurrences> > <node_id>at0011</node_id> > ... > > where lower occurences number is 1 and not 0! Maybe is the XML serialization > wrong!? > > leo > > > Alessandro Torrisi-3 wrote: > >> Leo, >> >> perhaps you can look to this : >> >> http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/rm/ehr_im.pdf >> >> then section 8.3.3. CARE_ENTRY Class >> >> over there you can see that protocol is 0..1 So never be mandatory >> >> Alessandro >> >> >> On 16 July 2010 11:47, Leonardo Moretti<lmoretti at noemalife.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Alessandro, >>> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} is referred to "items" >>> elements, >>> not to "protocol" element >>> >>> This means we can have something like this: >>> <observation> >>> <data> >>> ... >>> </data> >>> <protocol archetype_node_id="at0011" xsi:type="ITEM_TREE"> >>> <name> >>> <value>*List(en)</value> >>> </name> >>> </protocol> >>> <observation> >>> >>> Is the section >>> <protocol archetype_node_id="at0011" xsi:type="ITEM_TREE"> >>> <name> >>> <value>*List(en)</value> >>> </name> >>> </protocol> >>> mandatory, even if it doesn't have any items? >>> Looking at the archetype defintion, so it seems! >>> >>> leo >>> >>> >>> Alessandro Torrisi-3 wrote: >>> >>>> Leo, >>>> >>>> as far as i can see the protocol section is not mandatory : >>>> >>>> protocol matches { >>>> ITEM_TREE[at0011] matches { -- lijst structuur >>>> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} matches { >>>> >>>> as you can see 0..* (means zero times until unbounded times), so not >>>> mandatory >>>> >>>> Alessandro >>>> >>>> >>>> On 15 July 2010 17:57, Moretti Leonardo<lmoretti at noemalife.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> I have a doubt in interpretating the archetype definition when there >>>>> >>> are >>> >>>>> "state" or "protocol" structure. For example, looking at "Blood >>>>> Pressure" in http://openehr.org/knowledge/, I'm wondering if >>>>> >>> "protocol" >>> >>>>> structure is mandatory, as it seems looking at the archetype. If I >>>>> >>> don't >>> >>>>> know any details about the protocol, do I have to insert an empty tag >>>>> <protocol> however? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> leo >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>>>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >>>>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alessandro Torrisi >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >>>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/%22state%22-and--%22protocol%22-structures-are-mandatory%2C-when-defined--tp29174701p29181878.html >>> Sent from the openehr-technical mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-technical mailing list >>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alessandro Torrisi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >> >> >> > -- Ocean Informatics *Thomas Beale Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics <http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>* Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation <http://www.openehr.org/> Honorary Research Fellow, University College London <http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society <http://www.bcs.org.uk/> Health IT blog <http://www.wolandscat.net/> * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100726/2c729836/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ocean_full_small.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5828 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100726/2c729836/attachment.jpg>
