I'm used to thinking compositions as semantcally self contained units of information, at the very least using references to other means of expressing semantics (as in terminologies)
What you're describing seems to take some clincal semantics out of the composion and if we have multiple ways of doing that, it may hurt reusability of queries and data. Do you think we can find a way of expressing this semantcs without losing its trace within the cmposition? (Sorry for the typos, on the phone..) On Friday, August 17, 2018, Thomas Beale <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a bigger question of how best to model 'encounter' and > 'admission', which some implementers are doing with Folders, particularly > DIPS in Norway. I suspect that some version of using Folders (or else some > kind of tagging, which is semantically equivalent) will be the long term > approach to doing this. > > - thomas > > On 17/08/2018 10:54, Dileep V S wrote: > > Hi, > > Can you write an AQL to query only on a list of specific compositions? Is > there any sample for reference? > > I am trying to create the concept of clinical encounters and maintain a > collection of compositions per encounter. I am using AQL to retrieve data > per encounter and need to pass the corresponding set of compositions. > > Thanks in advance > > regards > > > -- > Thomas Beale > Principal, Ars Semantica <http://www.arssemantica.com> > Consultant, ABD Project, Intermountain Healthcare > <https://intermountainhealthcare.org/> > Management Board, Specifications Program Lead, openEHR Foundation > <http://www.openehr.org> > Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society > <http://www.bcs.org/category/6044> > Health IT blog <http://wolandscat.net/> | Culture blog > <http://wolandsothercat.net/> | The Objective Stance > <https://theobjectivestance.net/> >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
