Hi Mohammads... :)

Now that's a big sentence!  Edgar Allan Poe would be jealous.

Comments below.

On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Mohammed Nour wrote:

Hi Daves...

Sure you can assign it to me, it will be my honor and pleasure :), but - correct me if I am wrong - I have noticed that there is no iTests for using local interfaces, so I have some simple re-factoring ideas so we can make iTests for using local interfaces, I am working on them and will send you a patch, this of caurse will include the re-factored impl of the two iTests
that you and me did.

Ok. I updated OPENEJB-146 "iTest: StatelessLocalJndiTests" so it no longer includes testing the local business interface -- probably should have been that way from the beginning.

I'll leave 146 assigned to you until I hear otherwise.

The tests OPENEJB-145 and OPENEJB-171 don't need to be updated as they intentionally are only for remote interfaces. Unless when you say "refactor" you mean you simply adding a local and local-home interfaces to the POJOs we created. That would be fine.

I want to ask you a favor, can I have a JIRA of a
feature to impl beside the iTests, if it is OK with you I will be very
happy, but if u see that I rush to have more tasks so I will stick with the
iTests till I finish them all and then go into new features JIRAs.

You can work on whatever you think you can do. I personally don't take more than one or two at a time cause I just can't do more than one or two at a time. I'd love to do them all.

-David

Thanks and best regards...
Mohammad Nour El-Din


On 8/29/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Great patch, Mohammad.  It applied, built and ran perfectly.

Regarding OPENEJB-146, as I've said here (http://
marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-development&m=115561420703000&w=2)
doing that one requires a whole bunch of functionality we don't have
yet, so there are probably better jiras to work on.

OPENEJB-147 would be a good one.  That will be easier than the one
you just did as you won't even have to create a new bean and add it
to the various deployment descriptors.

Let me know and I'll assign it to you.

Thanks!
David


On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:

> Hi Daves...
>
> I attached the new diff file to OPENEJB-171, I will work on
> OPENEJB-146 with
> the same procedure.
>
> Thanks and best regards...
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
>
> On 8/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 26, 2006, at 1:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> > I'll take a look at this and get back to you later today.
>>
>> The patch looks good, you're just missing a few files.  Not a big
>> deal, you just need to 'svn add' them so svn will include them in the
>> patch.  Give that a try and attach a new patch file here:  http://
>> jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-171
>>
>> > On Aug 26, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Daves...
>> >> I followed the steps you explained to me, but I have a couple of
>> >> stupid questions :) :
>> >> I don't see any thing the build output which indicates that the
>> >> test case was running, why?
>>
>> It's just the way the surefire plugin works.  It only displays the
>> names of the tests that are in that module and we have all the itests >> in another module. If it fails though, there will be a report under
>> openejb-core/target/surefire-reports/
>>
>> >> What is the use of spring.xml, is it for assembling the components
>> >> of the EJB container? If yes, do I have to read about spring to
>> >> know the details of this XML file ?
>>
>> Yes, and it's experimental. You don't need to understand it to work
>> on OpenEJB.  You'll need to add OpenEJB deployments to it whenever
>> you add them to the ejb-jar.xml, but we can help with that if the
>> need comes up again.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>



Reply via email to