Hi Dave...

On 9/2/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Excellent work Mohammad!  I applied an updated version of the patch
which contains the modifications I mentioned before.  I went ahead
and assigned you OPENEJB-147 and OPENEJB-172.

Will take a look at that email you mention.

It's so great to have your help! Thank you!


You are so welcome :)

-David


On Sep 2, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:

> Hi Dave...
>
> Sorry for being late to reply, I added the missing files and made the
> changes you asked for.
> Here is the new patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-146.
> I will
> work on *OPENEJB-147* & *OPENEJB-172*, please assign them to me.
> One more
> favor, please take a look at this mail
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-
> development&m=115699229501566&w=2 .
>
> Thanks and best regards...
> Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
>
> On 8/31/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mohammad!
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Dave...
>> >
>> > I have submited the patch of OPENEJB-146, please review and assign
>> > to me
>> > OPENEJB-147 :)
>>
>> Excellent!  I reviewed the patch and have a couple of notes:
>>
>> The first is simple, you forgot to 'svn add' the component local
>> interfaces :)
>>
>> Also, go ahead and put the local interfaces on the
>> BasicStatelessPojoBean that we created in the last set of tests.  No
>> need to add inheritance and copy the bean def in the descriptors.  My
>> original note in that jira was actually about splitting the component
>> local and business local interface tests into two beans, but we don't
>> need to do that for the component remote and the component local
>> tests.
>>
>> Looking great!  You're starting to cook :)
>>
>> -David
>>
>> > Thanks and best regards...
>> > Mohammad Nour El-Din
>> >
>> >
>> > On 8/30/06, Mohammed Nour < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Daves...
>> >>
>> >>  On 8/30/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Mohammads... :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Now that's a big sentence!  Edgar Allan Poe would be jealous.
>> >> >
>> >> > Comments below.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Hi Daves...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Sure you can assign it to me, it will be my honor and
>> >> pleasure :),
>> >> > > but -
>> >> > > correct me if I am wrong - I have noticed that there is no
>> iTests
>> >> > > for using
>> >> > > local interfaces, so I have some simple re-factoring ideas
>> so we
>> >> > > can make
>> >> > > iTests for using local interfaces, I am working on them and
>> will
>> >> > > send you a
>> >> > > patch, this of caurse will include the re-factored impl of the
>> >> two
>> >> > > iTests
>> >> > > that you and me did.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ok.  I updated OPENEJB-146 "iTest: StatelessLocalJndiTests" so
>> >> it no
>> >> > longer includes testing the local business interface -- probably
>> >> > should have been that way from the beginning.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'll leave 146 assigned to you until I hear otherwise.
>> >> >
>> >> > The tests OPENEJB-145 and OPENEJB-171 don't need to be
>> updated as
>> >> > they intentionally are only for remote interfaces.  Unless
>> when you
>> >> > say "refactor" you mean you simply adding a local and local-home
>> >> > interfaces to the POJOs we created.  That would be fine.
>> >> >
>> >> > > I want to ask you a favor, can I have a JIRA of a
>> >> > > feature to impl beside the iTests, if it is OK with you I will
>> >> be very
>> >> > > happy, but if u see that I rush to have more tasks so I will
>> >> stick
>> >> > > with the
>> >> > > iTests till I finish them all and then go into new features
>> >> JIRAs.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can work on whatever you think you can do.  I personally
>> don't
>> >> > take more than one or two at a time cause I just can't do
>> more than
>> >> > one or two at a time.  I'd love to do them all.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  Thanks for the advice, and I will stick with it :)
>> >>
>> >> -David
>> >> >
>> >> > > Thanks and best regards...
>> >> > > Mohammad Nour El-Din
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 8/29/06, David Blevins < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Great patch, Mohammad.  It applied, built and ran perfectly.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Regarding OPENEJB-146, as I've said here (http://
>> >> > >> marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-
>> >> development&m=115561420703000&w=2)
>> >> > >> doing that one requires a whole bunch of functionality we
>> >> don't have
>> >> > >> yet, so there are probably better jiras to work on.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> OPENEJB-147 would be a good one.  That will be easier than
>> >> the one
>> >> > >> you just did as you won't even have to create a new bean and
>> >> add it
>> >> > >> to the various deployment descriptors.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Let me know and I'll assign it to you.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Thanks!
>> >> > >> David
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > Hi Daves...
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > I attached the new diff file to OPENEJB-171, I will work on
>> >> > >> > OPENEJB-146 with
>> >> > >> > the same procedure.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Thanks and best regards...
>> >> > >> > Mohammad Nour El-Din
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > On 8/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> On Aug 26, 2006, at 1:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> >> > >> >> > I'll take a look at this and get back to you later
>> today.
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> The patch looks good, you're just missing a few files.
>> >> Not a big
>> >> > >> >> deal, you just need to 'svn add' them so svn will include
>> >> them
>> >> > >> in the
>> >> > >> >> patch.  Give that a try and attach a new patch file here:
>> >> http://
>> >> > >> >> jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-171
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> > On Aug 26, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> Hi Daves...
>> >> > >> >> >> I followed the steps you explained to me, but I have a
>> >> > >> couple of
>> >> > >> >> >> stupid questions :) :
>> >> > >> >> >> I don't see any thing the build output which indicates
>> >> that the
>> >> > >> >> >> test case was running, why?
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> It's just the way the surefire plugin works.  It only
>> >> displays the
>> >> > >> >> names of the tests that are in that module and we have all
>> >> the
>> >> > >> itests
>> >> > >> >> in another module.  If it fails though, there will be a
>> >> report
>> >> > >> under
>> >> > >> >> openejb-core/target/surefire-reports/
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> >> What is the use of spring.xml, is it for assembling the
>> >> > >> components
>> >> > >> >> >> of the EJB container? If yes, do I have to read about
>> >> spring to
>> >> >
>> >> > >> >> >> know the details of this XML file ?
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> Yes, and it's experimental.  You don't need to understand
>> >> it to
>> >> > >> work
>> >> > >> >> on OpenEJB.  You'll need to add OpenEJB deployments to it
>> >> whenever
>> >> >
>> >> > >> >> you add them to the ejb-jar.xml, but we can help with that
>> >> if the
>> >> > >> >> need comes up again.
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> -David
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>


Reply via email to