On 8/31/06, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Hi Dave...

I have submited the patch of OPENEJB-146, please review and assign to me
OPENEJB-147 :)

 Sorry for the inconvenience, here is the link of OPENEJB-146
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-146


Thanks and best regards...
Mohammad Nour El-Din


 On 8/30/06, Mohammed Nour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Daves...
>
>  On 8/30/06, David Blevins < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mohammads... :)
> >
> > Now that's a big sentence!  Edgar Allan Poe would be jealous.
> >
> > Comments below.
> >
> > On Aug 29, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daves...
> > >
> > > Sure you can assign it to me, it will be my honor and pleasure :),
> > > but -
> > > correct me if I am wrong - I have noticed that there is no iTests
> > > for using
> > > local interfaces, so I have some simple re-factoring ideas so we
> > > can make
> > > iTests for using local interfaces, I am working on them and will
> > > send you a
> > > patch, this of caurse will include the re-factored impl of the two
> > > iTests
> > > that you and me did.
> >
> > Ok.  I updated OPENEJB-146 "iTest: StatelessLocalJndiTests" so it no
> > longer includes testing the local business interface -- probably
> > should have been that way from the beginning.
> >
> > I'll leave 146 assigned to you until I hear otherwise.
> >
> > The tests OPENEJB-145 and OPENEJB-171 don't need to be updated as
> > they intentionally are only for remote interfaces.  Unless when you
> > say "refactor" you mean you simply adding a local and local-home
> > interfaces to the POJOs we created.  That would be fine.
> >
> > > I want to ask you a favor, can I have a JIRA of a
> > > feature to impl beside the iTests, if it is OK with you I will be
> > very
> > > happy, but if u see that I rush to have more tasks so I will stick
> > > with the
> > > iTests till I finish them all and then go into new features JIRAs.
> >
> > You can work on whatever you think you can do.  I personally don't
> > take more than one or two at a time cause I just can't do more than
> > one or two at a time.  I'd love to do them all.
>
>
>  Thanks for the advice, and I will stick with it :)
>
> -David
> >
> > > Thanks and best regards...
> > > Mohammad Nour El-Din
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/29/06, David Blevins < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Great patch, Mohammad.  It applied, built and ran perfectly.
> > >>
> > >> Regarding OPENEJB-146, as I've said here (http://
> > >> marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-development&m=115561420703000&w=2)
> > >> doing that one requires a whole bunch of functionality we don't
> > have
> > >> yet, so there are probably better jiras to work on.
> > >>
> > >> OPENEJB-147 would be a good one.  That will be easier than the one
> > >> you just did as you won't even have to create a new bean and add it
> >
> > >> to the various deployment descriptors.
> > >>
> > >> Let me know and I'll assign it to you.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >> David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Aug 27, 2006, at 5:12 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Daves...
> > >> >
> > >> > I attached the new diff file to OPENEJB-171, I will work on
> > >> > OPENEJB-146 with
> > >> > the same procedure.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks and best regards...
> > >> > Mohammad Nour El-Din
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 8/27/06, David Blevins < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Aug 26, 2006, at 1:31 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> > >> >> > I'll take a look at this and get back to you later today.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The patch looks good, you're just missing a few files.  Not a
> > big
> > >> >> deal, you just need to 'svn add' them so svn will include them
> > >> in the
> > >> >> patch.  Give that a try and attach a new patch file
> > here:  http://
> > >> >> jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-171
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > On Aug 26, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Hi Daves...
> > >> >> >> I followed the steps you explained to me, but I have a
> > >> couple of
> > >> >> >> stupid questions :) :
> > >> >> >> I don't see any thing the build output which indicates that
> > the
> > >> >> >> test case was running, why?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It's just the way the surefire plugin works.  It only displays
> > the
> > >> >> names of the tests that are in that module and we have all the
> > >> itests
> > >> >> in another module.  If it fails though, there will be a report
> > >> under
> > >> >> openejb-core/target/surefire-reports/
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >> What is the use of spring.xml, is it for assembling the
> > >> components
> > >> >> >> of the EJB container? If yes, do I have to read about spring
> > to
> > >> >> >> know the details of this XML file ?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Yes, and it's experimental.  You don't need to understand it to
> > >> work
> > >> >> on OpenEJB.  You'll need to add OpenEJB deployments to it
> > whenever
> > >> >> you add them to the ejb-jar.xml, but we can help with that if
> > the
> > >> >> need comes up again.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -David
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to