On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 13 jun 2011, om 22:28 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > > > On 06/13/2011 11:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Khem was asking if I could reproduce the recent x86 breakage he was > >> seeing[1] and I ran into another bug: > >> > >> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel$ git blame > >> meta-n450/conf/machine/n450.conf | grep atom > >> 158f88d7 (Saul Wold 2011-01-03 15:33:52 -0800 6) require > >> conf/machine/atom-pc.conf > >> > > meta-yocto seems to be the place you need to look! > > > > I hope that the layering tools can help to detect and inform folks of this > > like of dependency. > > Isn't meta-yocto supposed to a the integration layer with no new > parts? I can't use meta-yocto since it has conflicting beagleboard > stuff in it, which means that meta-intel is now broken for me as well. > That surely isn't the intended plan?!?!
The plan on public record is that atom-pc moves to meta-intel as soon as the layer tooling comes online and meta-yocto becomes its own repo (which at present its not but its certainly the intent). Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
