On Tuesday 14 June 2011 01:09:27 Otavio Salvador wrote: > I know the delta is getting smaller and smaller. This is good. A good > way to make it move faster is using OE-Core as basis. This will > "force" the backporting of missing Poky's change to OE-Core to happen > faster.
We *are* using oe-core as a basis. The thing limiting us right now is the lack of appropriate layer tooling, something which is being worked on right now and should arrive very soon - in fact the combo layer tool you responded to earlier is the most important piece that we need to fix this integration issue. > Currently there're many people that base the stuff (that is target to > OE-Core) on Poky and sometimes it cases issues (as the bitbake ones I > used as example). Since bitbake upstream and the one in poky are now very close (differences almost negligible) and we now send all of our changes via upstream first, I would not expect any more bitbake divergence in future. I'm not saying we can't do better or we shouldn't test with oe-core alone - we definitely should do the latter more often. I can only reiterate what Richard has said - bear with us, we're working on it :) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core