On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 23:04, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: ... > So on the one hand I do understand your concern. I'm personally and > Yocto are doing the best we can. On the other I'd suggest if testing > certain combinations is this important to you (or Mentor?), stepping up > and helping with the testing would be *much* appreciated and it isn't > the sole responsibility of myself or Saul. ...
It would be easier and better if people at Yocto could start basing their work on oe-core so stuff get tested there instead of Poky. Poky would then be an integration point not a base. More then once I got broken trees for stuff that were pushed to oe-core and were not working due missing fixes or features that were pushed to Poky's bitbake but not to the upstream one. Doing this would help to improve it a lot. For example meta-intel would be already fixed since people would be using it against oe-core and would have already noticed the missing machine definition and like. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
