On 12.10.2011 20:14, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > Op 12 okt. 2011 om 20:10 heeft Simon Busch <morp...@gravedo.de> het volgende > geschreven: > >> On 12.10.2011 10:02, Eric Bénard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Le 12/10/2011 09:45, Martin Jansa a écrit : >>>> From: Simon Busch<morp...@gravedo.de> >>>> >>>> In most cases we don't need tslib in std. configuration as touchscreen >>>> access in most >>>> devices today is done with linux input interface. If some specific >>>> machine has a need for >>>> tslib support it should add the dependency in it's machine layer again >>>> and modify the >>>> profile script accordingly. >>>> >>> When using a resistive touchscreen, tslib is a common solution to handle >>> calibration and raw value processing : do you think this is a good thing >>> to remove this ? >> >> Thats up to the environment you are using qt4-embedded in. In my case >> the setup is a little bit more complicated. We're using tslib but not >> directly in qt4-embedded (we can get rid of tslib completely but time is >> missing). >> >> I removed the dependency from qt4-embedded as qt4-embedded in oe-core >> should be the general thing used in all environments and therefore >> should be only a minimal setup with minimal dependencies. > > No, it should work in most cases, breaking qt:e like is not acceptable.
What is breaking qt:e in this case? For me it's just a feature reduction and not a break (as qt:e still works fine with the linux input interface). -- Simon Busch - http://mm.gravedo.de/blog/ _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core