On 12.10.2011 21:29, Simon Busch wrote: > On 12.10.2011 21:24, Simon Busch wrote: >> On 12.10.2011 21:09, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> What is breaking qt:e in this case? For me it's just a feature reduction >>>> and not a break (as qt:e still works fine with the linux input interface). >>> >>> When your TS is suddenly uncalibrated and jittery, it's a breakage, not a >>> feature reduction. >> >> You're talking here about one case where tslib is needed to get a >> working touchscreen. But there are even cases where tslib is not needed >> to get a working touchscreen. >> >> qt:e does not strongly depends on tslib, it can work without. So if you >> need it you should add it to your machine layer as it is really machine >> specific if you need tslib or not. > > Eric brings it to the point, only resetting the qte.sh script to a > default one which uses a linux input even node should be enough.
Sorry for my little generic trip ... :) I will provide another patch in the following days which just makes qte.sh use of a std. linux input dev node instead of a tslib one if nobody has any objections against this. regards, Simon -- Simon Busch - http://mm.gravedo.de/blog/ _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
