Sure, RPM naming convention from rpm.org: http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-file-format.html As you can see, there are nothing about "core2_64" architecture.
-- With best wishes, Sergei Zhmylev Engineering consultant OS development department On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 09:34 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > «Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!» > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 09:25, Sergey Zhmylev <s.zhmy...@yadro.com> > wrote: > > > > Exactly! Even more: when I build for "genericx86_64", I get mix of > > packages with architecture one of: "x86_64", "genericx86_64", > > "core2_64", and "noarch". Our audit team highlited this as this is > > not > > compliant with common RPM naming convention. > > Can you please link to (or describe with references) the common > naming > convention? > > Alex >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#175816): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175816 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96233100/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
