> On 13 Jan 2023, at 12:29, Sergey Zhmylev via lists.openembedded.org > <s.zhmylev=yadro....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: >> So no, I don't think we should be taking a patch which would just >> confuse things for what seems to be a cosmetic reason. >> > > The patch proposed is not about a cosmetic change, it's about precise > control over what packaging system produces. Given the recipes can > override variables with a priority over any confs/classes, it looks > like there is no proper way to overload the values (in particular > PACKAGE_ARCH) used during packaging process. Some variables could be > used to adjust TUNE flags and their values should stay intact prior to > packaging.
What is the use-case for this level of control then, and why would it be specific to RPM? Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#175825): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175825 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96233100/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
