On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 7/26/12 4:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 21:38 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> >>>> the other alternative which comes to mind would be so set a variable >>>> with the name we want used there, defaulting it to PN. >>> >>> >>> That sounds like the most wholesome plan to me. >> >> >> can we use BPN, unless we generate locale for native and nativesdk >> cross and crosssdk >> class of recipes that should work too. I thought about it and thought >> it was too >> intrusive. > > > There are cases for multilibs where locales for specific multilib packages > will be generated. We theoretically could generate them for native(sdk) and > cross(sdk) as well, but I don't believe we do that in the general cases. > > --Mark
After RPs fix and Paul's root file system rework I am still seeing temp/run.do_rootfs.25593: 932: local: locale-base-en-gb: bad variable name > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
