On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 17:56 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote: >> Change in V2: The fourth patch fixed the QA Issue on udev, it was missed on >> previous version. >> >> //Hongxu >> >> The following changes since commit f3541226b8b1187e79dec0f6f9f3c58cedf9ac9b: >> >> bitbake: hob: do not display the "Package list may be incomplete!" dialog >> (2013-11-01 17:59:31 +0000) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-qa-issue >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/fix-qa-issue >> >> Hongxu Jia (5): >> insane.bbclass: support to skip unsafe references in binaries qa >> check. >> kmod: fix QA issue >> udev: fix QA issue >> udev: fix QA issue >> nfs-utils: fix QA issue > > Last time these warnings came up I asked for a clear plan about what > needed to live in / and what needed to live in /usr and how we were > going to fix things once and for all (or forget this idea). > > Where is the plan? Why is it ok to just ignore these particular > warnings?
I don't think supporting /bin and /sbin separated than /usr is worth the work. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core