On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 09:48 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 17:56 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote: > >> Change in V2: The fourth patch fixed the QA Issue on udev, it was missed > >> on previous version. > >> > >> //Hongxu > >> > >> The following changes since commit > >> f3541226b8b1187e79dec0f6f9f3c58cedf9ac9b: > >> > >> bitbake: hob: do not display the "Package list may be incomplete!" > >> dialog (2013-11-01 17:59:31 +0000) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-qa-issue > >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/fix-qa-issue > >> > >> Hongxu Jia (5): > >> insane.bbclass: support to skip unsafe references in binaries qa > >> check. > >> kmod: fix QA issue > >> udev: fix QA issue > >> udev: fix QA issue > >> nfs-utils: fix QA issue > > > > Last time these warnings came up I asked for a clear plan about what > > needed to live in / and what needed to live in /usr and how we were > > going to fix things once and for all (or forget this idea). > > > > Where is the plan? Why is it ok to just ignore these particular > > warnings? > > I don't think supporting /bin and /sbin separated than /usr is worth the work.
I keep hearing that some people do need this. I'm not against it in principle, equally I do want to see a plan and/or complete patchset before we take more patches for it. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
