Op 10 jan. 2014, om 15:01 heeft Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> het volgende geschreven:
> On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:45:23 Trevor Woerner wrote: >> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here >> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it >> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are >> suspected of being, unmaintained? > > This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers are > maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem. > > We have some immediate issues with patches to particular layers going > unmerged. That's in the process of being resolved. > > However, looking to the future it was suggested at the TSC meeting it would > be > nice to have some kind of measure or indication for the layer (ideally in the > layer index) as to how well-maintained it is. Is there a practical and > objective measurement we can have about the layer's maintenance status? I > don't have a good idea of what this would actually mean - how many > outstanding > patches it has? How recently it has been built/tested? Or how long it takes a patch to get applied on average. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
