Hi Paul,
On 01/10/14 09:01, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> This is all very interesting with people piping up that their layers
> are maintained, but I'm not sure it helps solve the overall problem.
> Also, if it does appear that a layer has gone "unmaintained" by
> popular consensus, what should actually be done about it?
I was hoping I could put together a list of the layers which are no
longer maintained to see if we could find people who might be interested
in stepping up and taking on their maintenance. Or at the very least,
clarifying a given layers' maintenance status.
At the last OE TSC meeting the issue of unmaintained layers was brought
up, I asked several times if people could specify to which layers they
were referring, but nobody replied. So people are concerned about layers
that have no maintainer, but nobody can say which ones (?). In my
opinion I thought it would be easier to solve this problem if we could
at least start by defining it.
As to what can be done about it: if a layer is not maintained, and
nobody cares for the layer, we should drop it from the list or at least
mark it as such ("buyer beware"). If a layer is not maintained, and
people do care, then we'll need to try to find someone to take
responsibility for it (we should, at the very least, make the attempt).
Also I think we should identify layers that people do care about, whose
maintenance is questionable, which are not hosted in a way where the
community can apply necessary patches to easily.
Best regards,
Trevor
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
