On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where > > > > 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream > > 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl > > 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current broken state, I would like to > > pull it out into a layer in meta-openembedded and we can leave the > > core plumbing as it is in OE-Core > > 4. Poky-tiny switches to use musl > In the past we have had issues with iconv support when using musl. Any experience good or bad with that? -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
