On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Roman Khimov <ro...@khimov.ru> wrote: > В письме от 29 октября 2015 08:42:31 пользователь Khem Raj написал: >> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream > > No opinion on this. > >> 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl > > I would certainly support this kind of for musl. > >> 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current broken state, I would like to pull it >> out into a layer in meta-openembedded and we can leave the core plumbing as >> it is in OE-Core > > But I don't think that moving uClibc out of OE Core is OK with the next > release. We do use it and there are probably some users too, I think it's > better to have a longer transition period for this kind of change, like make > the next release support three libcs and only move uClibc to meta-oe in a > subsequent release. This would give everyone some time to evaluate > alternatives rather than forcing to make choices right at the OE Core update > when usually there are lots of other things that need to be fixed.
may be not a bad idea however, this still will be available as an independent layer on meta-openembedded but we could still keep it for a release > >> 4. Poky-tiny switches to use musl > > No opinion on this. > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
