On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Tim Orling <ticot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where > >> > > >> > 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream > >> > 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl > >> > 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current broken state, I would like to > >> > pull it out into a layer in meta-openembedded and we can leave the > >> > core plumbing as it is in OE-Core > >> > 4. Poky-tiny switches to use musl > >> > > > > In the past we have had issues with iconv support when using musl. Any > > experience good or bad with that? > > it has got a lot better in locale area off late. I dont know what > issues you were facing though. > I am referring to this thread: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2014-March/018818.html I just happened to come across that thread today. No personal experience with musl yet. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
